Youtuber Gets Sued By Crypto Millionaire

Read the full lawsuit here:
https://tokenist.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/https-ecf-gand-uscourts-gov-doc1-055114767957.pdf

Follow Coffeezilla:
► Twitter: https://twitter.com/coffeebreak_YT
► Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/coffeebreak_yt/
► Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Coffeezilla-102981089132662
🎶 Music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMSQ1yoPT2c&list=PL4qw3AkxFDSNhEgawXD1j6r0iN1072XIB&index=1
Credits:
3D Artist: Ed Leszczynski https://twitter.com/LeszczynskiEd
Video Editor: Harry Bagg https://twitter.com/HarryRBagg
Virtual Production Software: Aximmetry https://aximmetry.com/

This video is an opinion and in no way should be construed as statements of fact. Scams, bad business opportunities, and fake gurus are subjective terms that mean different things to different people. I think someone who promises $100K/month for an upfront fee of $2K is a scam. Others would call it a Napoleon Hill pitch.

Recommended For You

About the Author: Beverly Barnhart

27 Comments

  1. Thanks to all your support, Bitboy just announced he’s dropping the lawsuit! presumably due to the backlash and financial support to ATOZY.

  2. Schrödingers Advice xD Investigation paired with humour is such an interesting and entertaining combination. Keep up the work!

  3. Its not financial advice, but it IS advice about your finances. Crypto Alex Jones knows this all too well.

  4. 1:53 I like how it flat lines at nothing. Then weeks or months later there’s a random blip.
    What was that person thinking? But they sold straight away.

  5. Bitboy is a pos and lately has been using his "investigative" skills on sbf in hopes that everyone forgets how much of a pos he is

  6. Not saying he is right or that his case is strong by any means. But it would help a whole lot if you actually argued against the context in the case, and not try to misrepresent it by sticking it to a specific topic.

    Being an incredibly source of anything is subjective. So you trying to act as if that somehow makes his argument worse speaks more on your lack of understanding the legal system. All he needs to do to show damages is a loss of sub's/revenue in correlation to the video being released.

  7. I doubt it’s defamation, it sounds more like an opinion plus showing “damages” as a YouTuber would likely be negligent at best

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *